EB-1, EB-2, EB-3
Retrogression: when the priority date moves backwards
- Published by
- Department of State, monthly
- Two charts
- Final Action Dates · Dates for Filing
- Which applies
- USCIS announces monthly for adjustment
A priority date is a place in a queue, and the queue can move backwards. When it does, filings that were imminent become impossible, and cases that were nearly finished go back to waiting — sometimes for years.
The two charts
The Visa Bulletin publishes two tables each month. Final Action Dates govern when a case can actually be approved. Dates for Filing govern when an adjustment application may be submitted, and are generally further forward.
USCIS announces each month which chart adjustment applicants may use. That announcement matters commercially, because filing under the earlier chart unlocks interim benefits — work authorization and advance parole — long before the case can be approved.
For consular cases the National Visa Center works from its own scheduling logic. The practical effect is the same: availability, not readiness, sets the pace.
What retrogression blocks
- New adjustment filings, if the date moves behind the applicable chart
- Approval of pending cases, which sit until the date is current again
- Planning, in a way that is hard to overstate — a date that retrogresses by three years turns a case that was a quarter from completion into one with no visible end
What it does not block is the underlying I-140. That petition can and should be adjudicated regardless of visa availability, and this is a distinction employers frequently get wrong.
USCIS is not obliged to hold an I-140 because a priority date is not current. The petition establishes eligibility; visa availability governs the final step. A company told that its I-140 is waiting for a priority date should ask the question again, because that is not how the two things relate.
Planning under retrogression
The uncomfortable truth is that nobody can forecast the bulletin reliably. What can be managed is exposure to it.
- File the PERM early. The 365-day AC21 mark is measured from filing, and it is the only protection against the sixth-year H-1B limit that retrogression makes relevant.
- Get the I-140 approved. Approval unlocks three-year extensions under § 104(c) precisely because the date is not current, and unlocks dependent work authorization. This is the single highest-value action available during a retrogressed period.
- File the adjustment when the filing chart allows it. Interim benefits are worth having years before the case can be approved.
- Track derivative children against age-out, because retrogression is the mechanism that turns a comfortable margin into a crisis.
Questions
- Can a retrogressed case be expedited?
- No. Visa availability is a statutory allocation, not an adjudication queue. What can be pushed is the I-140 and the adjustment adjudication, not the number.
- Does retrogression affect the I-140 processing time?
- It should not. The petition is adjudicated on eligibility. If it is sitting, the delay is a processing question and is treated as one.
General information, not legal advice. Rules and processing practice change; verify against the agency's own published figures and take advice on your own facts.
On mandamus.com
Federal litigation practice pages covering this area: