I-765, I-9, H-4, L-2
Building an I-9 reverification calendar that works
- Trigger
- Expiry of the employment authorization document
- Record
- Supplement B on the current Form I-9
- Owner
- One named person
Since the automatic extension was withdrawn for most new renewals, the reverification calendar has stopped being a compliance chore and become the control that determines whether people keep their jobs.
What has to be on it
Every employee whose employment authorization has an expiry date. For each one:
- The document expiry date
- Whether a renewal has been filed, and the receipt date on the I-797C — not the date it was posted, because the receipt date is what determines whether an automatic extension applies
- Whether any automatic extension applies, and if so its end date
- The date reverification is due
Permanent resident cards do not require reverification, and reverifying them creates its own problems. The list is employment authorization with an expiry, not everyone with a foreign passport.
The cadence that works
Four checkpoints, each with an owner and an action.
180 days out. Confirm a renewal is filed or has a filing date. This is the point at which action is still cheap.
120 days out. Confirm receipt, capture the receipt date, and determine the extension position. Anything unfiled at this point is escalated.
60 days out. Confirm the case is progressing. If it is not, this is when escalation options are considered rather than discussed.
14 days out. Confirm what document will be presented. Brief the manager. If there will be no valid document, the leave-or-termination conversation happens now, in advance, with employment counsel involved.
The whole point of the schedule is that the last checkpoint is never the first time anyone thought about it.
Getting the record right
Reverification is recorded on the current Form I-9 in the designated supplement, or on a new form where the edition in use requires it. Complete it on or before the expiry date, not after.
Two errors recur. Reverifying too early and creating a documentation demand the employee cannot meet. Specifying which document the employee must produce — the choice belongs to the employee from the acceptable list, and directing it is a discrimination exposure quite separate from the immigration question.
Both are avoided by having one trained owner rather than distributing the task to whichever manager is nearest.
Questions
- Does the calendar need a separate system?
- No. A spreadsheet with owners and dates outperforms an expensive system nobody maintains. What matters is that the receipt date field exists and gets filled in.
- Who should own it?
- One named person in HR operations, with a documented backup. Distributed ownership is the single most reliable predictor of a missed date.
General information, not legal advice. Rules and processing practice change; verify against the agency's own published figures and take advice on your own facts.
On mandamus.com
Federal litigation practice pages covering this area: